Home/SG171109 - Revision history

Bjornlin at 13:54, 21 November 2017

2017-11-21T13:54:15Z

2017-11-13T16:24:09Z

2017-11-13T16:20:02Z

‎NLPL SG 17-36. SG responsibilities according

2017-11-13T16:14:14Z

‎NLPL SG 17-40. Status report to NeIC board

2017-11-13T16:13:49Z

‎NLPL SG 17-40. Status report to NeIC board

2017-11-13T16:12:58Z

‎NLPL SG 17-41. Mid-term evaluation in 2H/3H 2018

2017-11-13T16:12:10Z

‎Do a cost-benefit analysis of the NLPL for the current year

2017-11-13T16:09:18Z

‎Do a cost-benefit analysis of the NLPL for the current year

2017-11-13T16:08:00Z

‎Elaborate the milestones for 2018

2017-11-13T16:07:31Z

‎Elaborate the milestones for 2018

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 = NLPL steering group meeting  =
 '''Time''': 2017-11-09
@@ Line 52: / Line 54: @@
 * 1/3 National e-Infrastructure providers
-The Steering Group responsibilities according to the [http://www.ppsonline.se/nordforsk/en/main/skill/ah134 PPS model]
+The Steering Group responsibilities according to the [http://www.ppsonline.se/nordforsk/en/main]
 Currently the project is in the  execution phase. In 6 months the Steering Group needs to discuss
@@ Line 300: / Line 302: @@
 |}
-''The project will not use Slack anymore. Email and Google Hangout/Zoom video meetings are channels for communication.''
+''The project will not use Slack anymore. Teams are free to still use it. Email and Google Hangout/Zoom video meetings are channels for communication.''
 == NLPL SG 17-38. A new NLPL partner? Computer Science Department @ IT University Of Copenhagen ==

@@ Line 445: / Line 445: @@
 One way to discuss the milestones for 2018 is to identify more specific targets under each milestone, keeping the benefits and the emerging technologies in mind. Each group member then characterise, each target by usefulness and risk. Use a character from the set {1,2,3,4,5} for usefulness, where 1 = not so useful and 5 = very useful. Do the similar for risk, where 1 = low risk and 5 = high risk.  Summaries and average the result and use it for sorting possible targets on usefulness and/or risk. Discuss the list.
- Overall conclusion from the discussion is that the current work plan has milestones with high usefulness, but very low risk. Looking into '18, the project should reach
+The overall conclusion is that the current work plan has milestones with high usefulness, but very low risk. Looking into '18, the project should reach all its targets for next year.
 == NLPL SG 17-43. Next meetings ==

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 == NLPL SG 17-36.  SG responsibilities according==
-Presenting NeIC, [https://wiki.neic.no/wiki/NeIC_Community_Wiki#Organisation the Organisation]
+Presenting [https://wiki.neic.no/wiki/NeIC_Community_Wiki#Organisation NeIC]. NeIC's funding comes from
 * 1/3 projects
 * 1/3 Nordforsk
@@ Line 55: / Line 54: @@
 The Steering Group responsibilities according to the [http://www.ppsonline.se/nordforsk/en/main/skill/ah134 PPS model]
-Currently the project is in the  execution phase of the project. In 6 months time the Steering Group needs to discuss
+Currently the project is in the  execution phase. In 6 months the Steering Group needs to discuss
-how to continue the project, by starting a new project or how to end project, which means how will the results of the project be transferred,
+how to continue the project, by formulating a follow-up project or how to end the project. By ending the project, the Steering Group needs to discuss how project results can be transferred,
 see item NLPL SG 17-41.

@@ Line 322: / Line 322: @@
 The following was reported to the NeIC Board meeting in September:
 NLPL Cost/Resource goal is changed from green to yellow: The Project Partner University of Copenhagen has reported that they currently do not have personnel who can contribute to the project. At earliest UoC can work on the project from next summer - one year after schedule.
 For the upcoming NeIC board meeting in December, the PM will report:

@@ Line 322: / Line 322: @@
 The following was reported to the NeIC Board meeting in September:
 NLPL Cost/Resource goal is changed from green to yellow: The Project Partner University of Copenhagen has reported that they currently do not have personnel who can contribute to the project. At earliest UoC can work on the project from next summer - one year after schedule.
-are informed by "traffic lights" covering
 For the upcoming NeIC board meeting in December, the PM will report:

@@ Line 328: / Line 328: @@
 == NLPL SG 17-41.  Mid-term evaluation in 2H/3H 2018 ==
-There will be a mid-term evaluation of the project by the NeIC board, either in June or September, next year. PM or PO will presentation the future direction of the project.
+There will be a mid-term evaluation of the project by the NeIC board, either in June or September, next year. PM or PO will present the future direction of the project.
 The Steering Group must work beforehand on a proposal on how to proceed. The next Steering Group F2F should be held before the mid-term evaluation. This is very important since it will impact the continuation of the project, see NLPL SG 17-43

@@ Line 343: / Line 343: @@
 Group2:
   * Access to taito and able is a real benefit.
-  * Some of the things we do in the project, would we have done anyway, but there is som extra work to comply with the project. It is benefit that software/infrastructure are equal on taito and abel. We have mixed experience with moving around from system to system.
+  * Some of the things we do in the project, would we have done anyway, but there is som extra work to comply with the project.
   * OPUS has a more permenant "home" - better infrastructure for the OPUS service now than previous (benefit).
   * Having baselines available from a common place is useful
 === Do a emerging technology analysis ===